> turner wrote:
>
>> thats true, but i dont like the porkatonic residue it leaves behind.
>>
>> On Apr 7, 2005, at 3:58 PM, gordon wrote:
>>
>>> turner wrote:
>>>
>>>> i used the sprongertron.
>>>>
>>>
>>> the monkey fondulator is smoother.
>>
>>
>
> you just need to use the elephantosmic remover in the second jugular valve complex, this will
> stop the residue from collecting on the wangufromjiggers waste exposure panel.

hmm,

wouldnt that hinder the oscillations of the gyrospastic enigmatron, decreasing the natural threshold for sprongpopia?

> You'd think it would, but in clinical trials the elephantosmic remover actually evens out faulty frequencies in most
> mass produced enigmatrons. so unless you are using the top of the line, say one from Froops Emporium, you are likely
> to see a noticable increase in fondulation, and a decrease in porkatonic residue. If you are using the Froop 9000, then
> ignore everything I have said, Froop builds a beauty of a monkey fondulator, and adding anything impure or not to the
> mix usually results in flawed oscillations and even ruptures in the reality continuity gasket, and you don't want that, oh no
> trust me....
>
> porkatonic residue all over the spacetime continuum... thats a pain in the ass to clean up.


so, you're not a fan of Sprongbot's monkey fondulators?
i find the new grip to be quite a treat over last year's model.

Yah, but you've got larger hands then me.
It reminds me of Kingergarten when I grip a Sprongbot.